Archived from Michael R. Merrifield's twitter --- Gaia Shows That Messier 40 is Definitely Not a Binary Star Michael R. Merrifield, Meghan E. Gray and Brady Haran School of Phyiscs & Astronomy University of Nottingham Notingham NG7 2RD -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Messier 40 has always been something of an oddity in the Messier Catalogue, since it is just a pair of stars rather than a nebulous object. [1] It seems to have ended up in the list because Charles Messier was following up on an observation by Hevelius [2] of a nebulous binary star in this vicinity. Although Messier identified no nebulosity (and, in fact, had found a different pair of stars to those of Hevelius), he added the pairing to his catalogue for completeness. Surprisingly, the identification was then lost until 1966, when the pair of stars were noted as almost certainly HD 238107 and HD 238108. [3] Little was known about this pair of stars, but a thorough analysis in 2002 noted that the proper motions derived from the Tycho 2 Catalogue and earlier observations indicated that these stars were likely unrelated objects passing each other in the sky. [4] Support for this interpretation came from the spectroscopic parallaxes estimated for these objects of 590 +/- 230pc and 170 +/- 70 pc, respectively. [4] However, the error bars were uncomfortably large, and the distances sufficiently great that Hipparcos data placed no significant constraint on their astrometric parallax distances, so that the possibility still remained that the stars could form a wide physical binary. [4] The first data release from the Gaia satellite [5] definitely puts paid to this interpretation. The combined Hipparcos/Gaia astrometric solutions gives parallaxes of 2.87 +/- 0.24 milliarcseconds and 7.13 +/- 0.24 milliarcseconds, translating into distances of 350 +/- 30 pc and 140 +/- 6 pc for the two objects. Messier 40 comprises a pair of entirely unrelated stars. 1. C. Messier, Catalogue des Nebuleuses & des amas d'Etoiles, 1781. 2. J. Hevelius, Figure of the Stars (2nd Edn), 1680. 3. J. Mallas, Sky and Telescope, 32, 83, 1966. 4. R.L. Nugent, Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada, 96, 63, 2002. 5. Lindegren, L., et al., Astronomy & Astrophysics, in press, 2016